Join the waitlist

DEET vs Other plant oils

The same eleven questions, side by side, each answer in the agency's words. No verdict from us: we sell a product built on one of these actives, so the agencies do the talking.

DEETN,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide
Other plant oils25(b) exempt: lemongrass, peppermint, cedar, soybean, others

Per EPA's tool

DEET

Registered; 505 products in EPA's tool; 2 to 12 h mosquitoes, 2 to 10 h ticks.

Other plant oils

Exempt, not registered; Not in EPA’s tool.

What is it, and where does it come from?

DEET

EPA says DEET, made for skin, works by making it hard for biting bugs to smell us.

Source and detail: EPA

DEET, N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide, is what EPA's DEET page calls the active ingredient in many repellent products, designed for direct application to people's skin. EPA says it was developed by the U.S. Army in 1946 and registered for use by the general public in 1957, and that rather than killing biting bugs it works by making it hard for them to smell us.

DEET (chemical name, N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) is the active ingredient in many repellent products. It is widely used to repel biting pests such as mosquitoes and ticks. Every year, an estimated one-third of the U.S. population use DEET to protect them from mosquito-borne illnesses like West Nile Virus, the Zika virus or malaria and tick-borne illnesses like Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22

DEET is designed for direct application to people's skin to repel insects. Rather than killing them, DEET works by making it hard for these biting bugs to smell us. After it was developed by the U.S. Army in 1946, DEET was registered for use by the general public in 1957. Approximately 120 products containing DEET are currently registered with EPA by about 30 different companies.

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22
Other plant oils

EPA names citronella, cedar, geranium, peppermint and soybean oils as examples of ingredients in unregistered repellents.

Source and detail: NPIC, US EPA

These are the plant oils EPA allows in repellents sold without registration: EPA's page on regulating skin-applied repellents names citronella oil, cedar oil, geranium oil, peppermint oil and soybean oil as examples of ingredients used in unregistered repellents. EPA's 1997 citronella fact sheet dates the exempting rule to February 28, 1996, under FIFRA Section 25(b). NPIC adds that no EPA-registered repellent contains garlic oil, rosemary, lemongrass, thyme or geraniol oils as active ingredients.

Examples of ingredients used in unregistered repellents are: Citronella oil. Cedar oil. Geranium oil. Peppermint and peppermint oil. Soybean oil.

US EPA, Regulation of Skin-Applied Repellents, last updated June 25, 2026

Because EPA has determined that certain "minimum risk pesticides" pose little to no risk to human health or the environment, EPA has exempted them from the requirement that they be registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

US EPA, Minimum Risk Pesticides Exempted from FIFRA Registration, last updated August 31, 2026

On February 28, 1996, the Agency issued a rule exempting certain pesticides, including oil of citronella, from regulation under FIFRA. In order to be eligible for this exemption (under FIFRA Section 25(b)), the oil of citronella products must meet all of the criteria listed below:

US EPA, R.E.D. FACTS, Oil of Citronella, EPA-738-F-97-002, February 1997

Some of these other repellents may be minimum risk pesticides and may not have to be registered with the EPA. There are no EPA-registered repellents that contain garlic oil, rosemary, lemongrass, thyme, or geraniol oils as active ingredients.

NPIC, Insect Repellents Fact Sheet, Oregon State University Extension Services, date reviewed February 2018

How does EPA treat it?

DEET

Registered, about 120 products per EPA; its 1998 review found repellents containing DEET present no health concern.

Source and detail: EPA

Registered: EPA's DEET page says approximately 120 products containing DEET are registered with EPA by about 30 companies. EPA's 1998 reregistration decision concluded that insect repellents containing DEET do not present a health concern; its registration review risk assessment found no risks of concern because no toxic effects have been identified when it is used as a dermally applied insect repellent, with a final decision waiting on Endocrine Disruptor Screening.

DEET is designed for direct application to people's skin to repel insects. Rather than killing them, DEET works by making it hard for these biting bugs to smell us. After it was developed by the U.S. Army in 1946, DEET was registered for use by the general public in 1957. Approximately 120 products containing DEET are currently registered with EPA by about 30 different companies.

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22

After completing a comprehensive re-assessment of DEET, we concluded that insect repellents containing DEET do not present a health concern. Consumers are advised to read and follow label directions when using any pesticide product, including insect repellents. Based on extensive toxicity testing, we believe that the normal use of DEET does not present a health concern to the general population, including children. We completed this review and issued a reregistration decision (called a RED) in 1998.

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22

The human health risk assessment concluded that there are no risks of concern because no toxic effects have been identified when used as a dermally applied insect repellent, and there is no dietary or occupational exposure for DEET. However, a Final Decision on the DEET registration review case will occur only after the EPA has completed an Endocrine Disruptor Screening under FFDCA section 408(p).

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22
Other plant oils

Exempt from registration under FIFRA Section 25(b); EPA says it is considering removing personal repellents from the exemption.

Source and detail: US EPA

Exempt under FIFRA Section 25(b): EPA says it has determined that certain minimum risk pesticides pose little to no risk to human health or the environment and has exempted them from FIFRA registration. As of EPA's personal-repellents page, read September 2026, EPA says it is considering a future rulemaking to remove personal mosquito and tick repellents from the exemption, after which they would need registration before sale.

Because EPA has determined that certain "minimum risk pesticides" pose little to no risk to human health or the environment, EPA has exempted them from the requirement that they be registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

US EPA, Minimum Risk Pesticides Exempted from FIFRA Registration, last updated August 31, 2026

On February 28, 1996, the Agency issued a rule exempting certain pesticides, including oil of citronella, from regulation under FIFRA. In order to be eligible for this exemption (under FIFRA Section 25(b)), the oil of citronella products must meet all of the criteria listed below:

US EPA, R.E.D. FACTS, Oil of Citronella, EPA-738-F-97-002, February 1997

To that end, we have explored rulemaking regarding personal insect repellents and in a future rulemaking are considering a proposal to remove personal mosquito and tick repellents from the minimum risk pesticides exemption currently in 40 CFR 152.25(f). This means that once removed from the exemption, personal mosquito and tick repellents would need to be registered as a pesticide product with EPA before sale or distribution in the United States.

US EPA, Personal Insect Repellents and Minimum Risk Pesticides

What strengths are registered, and does strength change protection?

DEET

EPA registers 5 to 99%; CDC says higher concentrations generally protect longer, with DEET peaking near 50%.

Source and detail: CDC Yellow Book, EPA

EPA's DEET page says formulations registered for direct application to human skin contain from 5 to 99 percent DEET. CDC's Yellow Book says higher concentrations generally provide longer protection regardless of the active ingredient, and that studies suggest DEET efficacy tends to peak at approximately 50 percent, with concentrations above that not offering a marked increase in protection time against mosquitoes.

Products containing DEET currently are available to the public in a variety of liquids, lotions, sprays, and impregnated materials (e.g., towelettes, roll on). Formulations registered for direct application to human skin contain from 5 to 99% DEET.

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22

In general, higher concentrations of active ingredients provide longer duration of protection, regardless of the active ingredient. Products with <10% active ingredient might offer only limited protection, often 1-2 hours. Products that offer sustained-release or controlled-release (microencapsulated) formulations, even with lower active ingredient concentrations, might provide longer protection times. Studies suggest that DEET efficacy tends to peak at a concentration of approximately 50% and that concentrations above that do not offer a marked increase in protection time against mosquitoes.

CDC Yellow Book, Mosquitoes, Ticks, and Other Arthropods (Wayback Machine capture 2026-09-19)
Other plant oils

No registered strength exists; EPA requires exempt labels to list every active by name and percentage by weight.

Source and detail: NPIC, US EPA

There is no registered strength to give: a product that meets EPA's six minimum-risk conditions does not need to be registered with EPA. EPA's conditions page says all active ingredients in an exempted product must be listed on the label by display name and percentage by weight. NPIC says higher concentration repellents may protect longer but are not better at keeping insects away, and under 10 percent may only protect for 1 to 2 hours.

A minimum risk product must meet the six conditions listed below. A product that meets all of these six conditions is then exempted from regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), i.e., the pesticide product does not need to be registered with EPA. However, states may require registration under state laws .

US EPA, Conditions for Minimum Risk Pesticides, last updated August 31, 2026

All of the ingredients in an exempted product (both active and inert) must be listed on the label: All active ingredients must be listed by label display name* and percentage (by weight).

US EPA, Conditions for Minimum Risk Pesticides, Condition 3, last updated August 31, 2026

Higher concentration repellents may protect people for longer. However, they are not better at keeping insects away. 5,6,7 Repellents with less than 10% of an active ingredient may only offer protection for short periods of time (1-2 hours).

NPIC, Insect Repellents Fact Sheet, Oregon State University Extension Services, date reviewed February 2018

How long does EPA say it protects?

DEET

EPA says 2 to 12 hours for mosquitoes and 2 to 10 for ticks, depending on the percentage.

Source and detail: EPA, U.S. EPA

EPA's DEET page says studies in its database indicate DEET repels ticks for about two to ten hours and mosquitoes from two to twelve hours, depending on the percentage of DEET in the product. In EPA's repellent search tool, Ben's 100 Insect Repellent, EPA Reg. No. 56575-7, at 98.11 percent DEET, lists 10 hours for mosquitoes and 10 for ticks. EPA says protection times vary because testing conditions differ, and that the tool's database was last updated in June 2019.

Studies in EPA's database indicate that DEET repels ticks for about two to ten hours, and mosquitoes from two to twelve hours depending on the percentage of DEET in the product.

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22

Ben's 100 Insect Repellent | 10 | 10 | DEET | 98.11 | Tender Corp. | 56575-7

EPA, Find the Repellent that is Right for You, search results for DEET, cfpub.epa.gov/oppref/insect_s

While this technical information is based on scientific testing guidelines and approved study methods, there are variations in the resulting protection times because of differences in the testing conditions.

EPA, Find the Repellent that is Right for You

Any products listed are for informational purposes only. Inclusion of a product listed/referenced is not an endorsement. * EPA and the U.S. Government do not endorse any product or service. * The information in this database was last updated in June 2019.

U.S. EPA, Find the Repellent that is Right for You
Other plant oils

EPA publishes no protection time; it says these products have not been evaluated for effectiveness.

Source and detail: US EPA

EPA publishes no protection time for these oils: its page on regulation of skin-applied repellents says products made from these ingredients have not been evaluated for effectiveness, and that repellents without an EPA registration number have not been evaluated by EPA, which cannot advise consumers about their effectiveness. EPA's search tool includes only skin-applied repellents registered by EPA; no unregistered products are listed.

In the 1990s, EPA evaluated the active ingredients in these unregistered products for safety . We determined that the active ingredients posed minimal risk to human health in the percentages found in products on the market. Based on this minimal risk determination, we decided that products made from these ingredients should be exempt from registration. Note that products made from these ingredients have not been evaluated for effectiveness .

US EPA, Regulation of Skin-Applied Repellents, last updated June 25, 2026

Repellents that do not bear an EPA registration number have not been evaluated by EPA, and EPA cannot advise consumers about the effectiveness of these products.

US EPA, Regulation of Skin-Applied Repellents, last updated June 25, 2026

The results from the search tool include only skin-applied repellent products registered by EPA. No unregistered products are listed.

US EPA, Find the Repellent that is Right for You, last updated September 8, 2026

Which pests do accepted labels name, and what does CDC say those pests carry?

DEET

A 15% label names mosquitoes, gnats, no-see-ums, biting flies, ticks, chiggers and fleas.

Source and detail: EPA notification label

The accepted label for a 15 percent DEET aerosol, EPA Reg. No. 4822-380, claims protection from mosquitoes, gnats, no-see-ums, biting flies, ticks, chiggers and fleas. On ticks, the label's exact wording is "including ticks that may cause Lyme disease."

EFFECTIVE PROTECTION from Mosquitoes, Gnats, No-See-Ums, Biting Flies, Ticks (including ticks that may cause Lyme disease), Chiggers and Fleas

EPA notification label, OFF! Insect Repellent II, EPA Reg. No. 4822-380, 15% DEET aerosol, November 13, 2009
Other plant oils

EPA says an exempt label may name the pest but not link it to any specific disease.

Source and detail: US EPA

An exempt label may name the pest but not a disease: EPA's conditions page says minimum risk labels may not claim to control insects in a way linking them with any specific disease, and EPA's 1997 citronella fact sheet gives ticks that carry Lyme disease as a claim an exempt product must not bear. EPA also lists Repels all insects as a claim implying a misleading range of effectiveness.

Minimum risk pesticide labels may not bear claims to control rodent, insect or microbial pests in a way that links the pests with any specific disease. The label claim may only be for the pest, as a pest, and not as a disease vector.

US EPA, Conditions for Minimum Risk Pesticides, Condition 4, last updated August 31, 2026

The product must not bear claims either to control or mitigate microorganisms that pose a threat to human health, including but not limited to, disease transmitting bacteria or viruses, or claims to control insects, rodents carrying specific diseases, including, but not limited to, ticks that carry Lyme disease.

US EPA, R.E.D. FACTS, Oil of Citronella, EPA-738-F-97-002, February 1997

Statements about the effectiveness of the product as a pesticide or device. Examples: "Kills all insects" "Kills many insects" "Repels all insects" These label claims may imply a misleading range of effectiveness.

US EPA, Conditions for Minimum Risk Pesticides, Condition 6, last updated August 31, 2026

What do the agencies say about children?

DEET

No age limit, EPA and CDC say, and EPA sets no percentage limit for children.

Source and detail: CDC Yellow Book, EPA

EPA's DEET page states that DEET "is approved for use on children with no age restriction," and that there is no restriction on the percentage of DEET in a product for use on children, since registration tests showed no difference in effects between young and adult animals. CDC's Yellow Book says insect repellents containing DEET, picaridin, IR3535 and 2-undecanone can be used on children without age restriction.

DEET is approved for use on children with no age restriction. There is no restriction on the percentage of DEET in the product for use on children, since data do not show any difference in effects between young animals and adult animals in tests done for product registration.

EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22

Insect repellents containing DEET, picaridin, IR3535, and 2-undecanone can be used on children without age restriction

CDC Yellow Book, Mosquitoes, Ticks, and Other Arthropods (Wayback Machine capture 2026-09-19)
Other plant oils

No agency statement found; CDC's list of actives without age restriction includes no exempt plant oil.

Source and detail: CDC Yellow Book

No agency we read gives an age floor for the exempt oils as a class. CDC's statement that certain actives can be used on children without age restriction names DEET, picaridin, IR3535 and 2-undecanone; no exempt plant oil is on that list.

Insect repellents containing DEET, picaridin, IR3535, and 2-undecanone can be used on children without age restriction

CDC Yellow Book, Mosquitoes, Ticks, and Other Arthropods (Wayback Machine capture 2026-09-19)

What do CDC and WHO say about pregnancy?

DEET

CDC lists it for pregnant and breastfeeding women; one 897-woman trial found no adverse effects to one year.

Source and detail: CDC, McGready R

CDC's Preventing Mosquito Bites page lists DEET among the active ingredients it names, and says that when used as directed, EPA-registered insect repellents are "proven safe and effective, even for pregnant and breastfeeding women." McGready 2001, a double-blind randomized trial of 897 women, found no adverse neurologic, gastrointestinal or dermatologic effects from daily DEET in the second and third trimesters, and none on survival, growth or development at birth or one year.

Use EPA-registered insect repellents with one of the following active ingredients. When used as directed, EPA-registered insect repellents are proven safe and effective, even for pregnant and breastfeeding women.

CDC, Preventing Mosquito Bites (Wayback Machine capture 2026-09-16)

When used as directed, EPA-registered insect repellents are proven safe and effective, even for pregnant and breastfeeding women. DEET Picaridin (known as KBR 3023 and icaridin outside the United States)

CDC, Preventing Mosquito Bites (Wayback Machine capture 2026-09-16)

The safety of daily application of N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) (1.7 g of DEET/day) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy was assessed as part of a double-blind, randomized, therapeutic trial of insect repellents for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy (n = 897). No adverse neurologic, gastrointestinal, or dermatologic effects were observed for women who applied a median total dose of 214.2 g of DEET per pregnancy (range = 0-345.1 g).

McGready R, et al. Safety of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-M-toluamide (DEET) in pregnancy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Oct;65(4):285-9. PMID 11693870

DEET crossed the placenta and was detected in 8% (95% confidence interval = 2.6-18.2) of cord blood samples from a randomly selected subgroup of DEET users (n = 50). No adverse effects on survival, growth, or development at birth, or at one year, were found. This is the first study to document the safety of DEET applied regularly in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

McGready R, et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Oct;65(4):285-9. PMID 11693870
Other plant oils

No CDC, WHO or EPA statement found; CDC's pregnancy list of actives includes no exempt plant oil.

Source and detail: CDC Travelers' Health

No CDC, WHO or EPA statement on the exempt oils and pregnancy was among the sources read. CDC's statement that EPA-registered repellents are proven safe and effective for pregnant and breastfeeding women when used as directed is attached to a named list of actives, and no exempt plant oil is on that list.

When used as directed, EPA-registered insect repellents are proven safe and effective, even for pregnant and breastfeeding women. If also using sunscreen, always apply insect repellent after sunscreen. DEET Picaridin (known as KBR 3023 and icaridin outside the US) IR3535 Oil of lemon eucalyptus (OLE) Para-menthane-diol (PMD) 2-undecanone

CDC Travelers' Health, Avoid Bug Bites

What do NPIC and EPA report about absorption and toxicity?

DEET

NPIC says a small amount absorbs through skin; EPA calls it generally low in acute toxicity.

Source and detail: EPA, NPIC

NPIC says a small amount of DEET applied to skin is taken into the body, more when alcohol is also on the skin. EPA's 1998 R.E.D. FACTS sheet calls DEET generally of low acute toxicity and a Group D carcinogen, not classifiable as a human carcinogen. EPA's 1998 reregistration decision counted 14 seizure cases since 1960, including four deaths, potentially related to DEET: an observed incidence of about one recognized seizure per 100 million users each year.

When DEET was applied to the skin of volunteers by researchers, they found that a small amount of the DEET was taken into the body through the skin. When DEET and alcohol are applied to the skin, more DEET is taken into the skin compared with DEET alone. Drinking alcohol may also cause more DEET to be absorbed through the skin. Sunscreen products that contain DEET may cause more DEET to be taken into the body through the skin.

NPIC, DEET General Fact Sheet

DEET generally is of low acute toxicity, and, based on the available toxicological data, the Agency believes that the normal use of DEET does not present a health concern to the general U.S. population (the Agency's human risk assessment has identified no toxicologically significant effects in animal studies.) DEET has been classified as a Group D carcinogen (not classifiable as a human carcinogen.)

EPA, R.E.D. FACTS: DEET, EPA-738-F-95-010, April 1998

In summary, since 1960, there have been 14 cases of seizure, including four deaths, potentially related to DEET exposure, for which other more likely causes have not been identified. An additional 32 cases of seizure reported to the national DEET registry are currently under review.

EPA, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) DEET, EPA738-R-98-010, approved April 13, 1998

people using DEET each year, the observed incidence of recognized seizures is about one per 100 million users.

EPA, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) DEET, EPA738-R-98-010, approved April 13, 1998
Other plant oils

EPA found minimal risk at market percentages in the 1990s; NPIC says essential oils are less widely studied.

Source and detail: NPIC, US EPA

EPA says that in the 1990s it evaluated the active ingredients in these unregistered products for safety and determined they posed minimal risk to human health in the percentages found in products on the market, the basis on which it exempted them. NPIC says the health risks and efficacy of essential oils have not been as widely studied as common insect repellents.

In the 1990s, EPA evaluated the active ingredients in these unregistered products for safety . We determined that the active ingredients posed minimal risk to human health in the percentages found in products on the market. Based on this minimal risk determination, we decided that products made from these ingredients should be exempt from registration. Note that products made from these ingredients have not been evaluated for effectiveness .

US EPA, Regulation of Skin-Applied Repellents, last updated June 25, 2026

The health risks and efficacy of essential oils have not been as widely studied as common insect repellents.

NPIC, Insect Repellents Fact Sheet, Oregon State University Extension Services, date reviewed February 2018

Does it damage plastics, fabrics or gear?

DEET

NPIC says it can damage certain plastics, rubber, vinyl and synthetics; a label spares nylon, cotton and wool.

Source and detail: EPA amended reregistration label, NPIC

NPIC's DEET technical fact sheet calls DEET a plasticizer that can damage certain rubber, plastic, vinyl or elastic materials, including contact lenses, eyeglass frames and lenses, watch crystals, combs, painted and varnished surfaces, and certain synthetic or treated fabrics. The accepted label for a 10 percent DEET product, EPA Reg. No. 121-53, says it will not damage nylon, cotton or wool.

DEET is a plasticizer and can damage certain rubber, plastic, vinyl, or elastic materials such as contact lenses, eyeglass frames and lenses, watch crystals, combs, painted and varnished surfaces, and certain synthetic or treated fabrics.

NPIC, DEET Technical Fact Sheet (archived)

Will not damage nylon, cotton, or wool.

EPA amended reregistration label, Cutter Insect Repellent #10GE, EPA Reg. No. 121-53, 10% DEET, March 18, 2009
Other plant oils

No agency statement found.

Source and detail: US EPA

No agency statement about the exempt oils and plastics, fabrics or gear was among the sources read. EPA says repellents that do not bear an EPA registration number have not been evaluated by EPA, and that it cannot advise consumers about the effectiveness of those products.

Repellents that do not bear an EPA registration number have not been evaluated by EPA, and EPA cannot advise consumers about the effectiveness of these products.

US EPA, Regulation of Skin-Applied Repellents, last updated June 25, 2026

What do the agencies say about pets?

DEET

EPA lists cats, dogs and horses as use sites; nothing on pets unless the label says so.

Source and detail: EPA, NPIC

EPA's 1998 R.E.D. FACTS sheet lists cats, dogs, horses and pet living and sleeping quarters among DEET's use sites. EPA tells consumers not to use any product on pets unless the label clearly states it is for animals. NPIC says reports of pets exposed to DEET in amounts that would make them sick are rare; overexposed pets have shown vomiting, shaking, excitement, lack of coordination and seizures.

N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) is an insect repellent used in households/domestic dwellings, on the human body and clothing being worn, on cats, dogs, horses and pet living/sleeping quarters. There are no food uses.

EPA, R.E.D. FACTS: DEET, EPA-738-F-95-010, April 1998

Do not use any product on pets or other animals unless the label clearly states it is for animals.

EPA, Using Insect Repellents Safely and Effectively

Reports of pets being exposed to DEET in amounts that would make them sick are rare. Pets that have been overexposed to DEET have shown varying effects, including vomiting, shaking, excitement, lack of coordination, and seizures.

NPIC, DEET General Fact Sheet
Other plant oils

Only EPA's general rule applies: nothing on pets unless the label says so.

Source and detail: EPA, US EPA

EPA's page on using insect repellents says not to use any product on pets or other animals unless the label clearly states it is for animals, and that most insect repellents do not work against lice or fleas. No agency statement specific to the exempt oils and pets was among the sources read.

Do not use any product on pets or other animals unless the label clearly states it is for animals. Most insect repellents do not work against lice or fleas.

US EPA, Using Insect Repellents Safely and Effectively

Do not use any product on pets or other animals unless the label clearly states it is for animals.

EPA, Using Insect Repellents Safely and Effectively

Which studies are on the record?

DEET

One trial found 20% DEET and 20% picaridin performed equally, with 97.4% protection over five hours.

Source and detail: Carroll JF, Van Roey K

Van Roey 2014 (PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases) reported an overall five-hour protection rate of 97.4 percent, with picaridin 20 percent performing equally well as DEET 20 percent. Carroll 2010 (Journal of Medical Entomology) found formulations of deet, picaridin and IR3535 at 20 percent or more active ingredient highly effective against lone star ticks over 12 hours, with fewer than 10 percent of ticks crossing the treatment bands.

Based on a total of 4996 mosquitoes collected on negative control persons, the overall five hour protection rate was 97.4% [95%CI: 97.1-97.8%], not decreasing over time. Picaridin 20% performed equally well as DEET 20% and better than picaridin 10%.

Van Roey K, et al. Field evaluation of picaridin repellents reveals differences in repellent sensitivity between Southeast Asian vectors of malaria and arboviruses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Dec 18;8(12):e3326. PMID 25522134

Formulations containing > or = 20% active ingredient were highly effective, with <10% of the ticks crossing through the treatment bands for any challenge during the 12 h. At least 40% of ticks exposed to any formulation for any challenge fell or crawled off the volunteers.

Carroll JF, Benante JP, Kramer M, Lohmeyer KH, Lawrence K. Formulations of deet, picaridin, and IR3535 applied to skin repel nymphs of the lone star tick (Acari: Ixodidae) for 12 hours. J Med Entomol. 2010 Jul;47(4):699-704. PMID 20695288

There was no difference in effectiveness between the 20% spray and 20% lotion formulations of picaridin. The 10% IR3535 lotion was significantly less effective than the formulations with higher concentrations of repellent. In the formulations tested, deet, picaridin, and IR3535 provided lasting protection against A. americanum.

Carroll JF, et al. J Med Entomol. 2010 Jul;47(4):699-704. PMID 20695288
Other plant oils

One 2002 trial found a soybean-oil repellent averaged 94.6 minutes; other botanicals tested averaged under 20 minutes.

Source and detail: Fradin MS, Maia MF

Fradin and Day, New England Journal of Medicine, 2002: a soybean-oil-based repellent protected against mosquito bites for an average of 94.6 minutes, the other botanicals tested for a mean under 20 minutes, and the authors concluded that the non-DEET repellents available at the time could not be relied on for prolonged protection where mosquito-borne diseases are a substantial threat. Maia and Moore, Malaria Journal, 2011, found insufficient studies had followed WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme guidelines.

A soybean-oil-based repellent protected against mosquito bites for an average of 94.6 minutes. The IR3535-based repellent protected for an average of 22.9 minutes. All other botanical repellents we tested provided protection for a mean duration of less than 20 minutes. Repellent-impregnated wristbands offered no protection.

Fradin MS, Day JF. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):13-8. PMID 12097535

CONCLUSIONS: Currently available non-DEET repellents do not provide protection for durations similar to those of DEET-based repellents and cannot be relied on to provide prolonged protection in environments where mosquito-borne diseases are a substantial threat.

Fradin MS, Day JF. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):13-8. PMID 12097535

To date insufficient studies have followed standard WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme guidelines for repellent testing. There is a need for further standardized studies in order to better evaluate repellent compounds and develop new products that offer high repellency as well as good consumer safety.

Maia MF, Moore SJ. Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing. Malar J. 2011;10 Suppl 1:S11. PMID 21411012

Sources on this page.

24 sources. Every quote was fetched on or before 2026-09-22 and is stored with the page. Last reviewed 2026-09-22. All ten actives.

  1. EPA, DEET (epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet), fetched 2026-09-22. https://www.epa.gov/insect-repellents/deet
  2. CDC Yellow Book, Mosquitoes, Ticks, and Other Arthropods (Wayback Machine capture 2026-09-19). https://www.cdc.gov/yellow-book/hcp/environmental-hazards-risks/mosquitoes-ticks-and-other-arthropods.html
  3. EPA, Find the Repellent that is Right for You, search results for DEET, cfpub.epa.gov/oppref/insect_s. https://cfpub.epa.gov/oppref/insect_s/search_results.cfm
  4. EPA, Find the Repellent that is Right for You. https://www.epa.gov/insect-repellents/find-repellent-right-you
  5. EPA notification label, OFF! Insect Repellent II, EPA Reg. No. 4822-380, 15% DEET aerosol, November 13, 2009. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/004822-00380-20091113.pdf
  6. CDC, Preventing Mosquito Bites (Wayback Machine capture 2026-09-16). https://www.cdc.gov/mosquitoes/prevention/index.html
  7. McGready R, et al. Safety of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-M-toluamide (DEET) in pregnancy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Oct;65(4):285-9. PMID 11693870. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11693870/
  8. NPIC, DEET General Fact Sheet. https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/DEETgen.html
  9. EPA, R.E.D. FACTS: DEET, EPA-738-F-95-010, April 1998. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/fs_PC-080301_1-Apr-98.pdf
  10. EPA, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) DEET, EPA738-R-98-010, approved April 13, 1998. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/red_PC-080301_1-Apr-98.pdf
  11. NPIC, DEET Technical Fact Sheet (archived). https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/DEETtech.html
  12. EPA amended reregistration label, Cutter Insect Repellent #10GE, EPA Reg. No. 121-53, 10% DEET, March 18, 2009. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000121-00053-20090318.pdf
  13. EPA, Using Insect Repellents Safely and Effectively. https://www.epa.gov/insect-repellents/using-insect-repellents-safely-and-effectively
  14. Van Roey K, et al. Field evaluation of picaridin repellents reveals differences in repellent sensitivity between Southeast Asian vectors of malaria and arboviruses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Dec 18;8(12):e3326. PMID 25522134. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25522134/
  15. Carroll JF, Benante JP, Kramer M, Lohmeyer KH, Lawrence K. Formulations of deet, picaridin, and IR3535 applied to skin repel nymphs of the lone star tick (Acari: Ixodidae) for 12 hours. J Med Entomol. 2010 Jul;47(4):699-704. PMID 20695288. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20695288/
  16. US EPA, Regulation of Skin-Applied Repellents, last updated June 25, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/insect-repellents/regulation-skin-applied-repellents
  17. NPIC, Insect Repellents Fact Sheet, Oregon State University Extension Services, date reviewed February 2018. https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/repellents.html
  18. US EPA, Minimum Risk Pesticides Exempted from FIFRA Registration, last updated August 31, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/minimum-risk-pesticides
  19. US EPA, Conditions for Minimum Risk Pesticides, Condition 6, last updated August 31, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/minimum-risk-pesticides/conditions-minimum-risk-pesticides
  20. Maia MF, Moore SJ. Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing. Malar J. 2011;10 Suppl 1:S11. PMID 21411012. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21411012/
  21. US EPA, R.E.D. FACTS, Oil of Citronella, EPA-738-F-97-002, February 1997. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/fs_PC-021901_1-Feb-97.pdf
  22. US EPA, Personal Insect Repellents and Minimum Risk Pesticides. https://www.epa.gov/minimum-risk-pesticides/personal-insect-repellents-and-minimum-risk-pesticides
  23. CDC Travelers' Health, Avoid Bug Bites. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/page/avoid-bug-bites
  24. Fradin MS, Day JF. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):13-8. PMID 12097535. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12097535/